Effect the structural changes to enable management of innovation projects across an internal network of competence centers and external network of alliances. This involves the arrangement of skills and expertise into competence centers across the organization, so that they can be flexibly allocated to various projects, depending on the needs of the innovation project. The organization should also be able to tap into external resources by managing external alliances and networks in a portfolio, as detailed in the following steps.
Step 1: Developing Competence Centers. As outlined in Chapter 7, in some organizations, competence centers develop naturally as specific business units, labs, departments, and groups develop a specialization in a certain area, so that they become known to management for their expertise. But this is not enough; this development should be systemized in a methodical way under the business model. The design of the business model should also define the criteria on which a new competence center will be developed and when to take advantage of innovation clusters. The following steps provide a guide:
1. The manager of each competence center (lab, department, unit, or group) should know the skills, expertise, and competencies of his or her personnel.* The manager should also keep a record of the projects assigned to each one in the center, time availability and ability to travel.
Step 2: Create and Manage an Alliance Portfolio. Alliances as a general rule should be sought to combine complementary strengths, increase learning and knowledge transfer, and get to market faster. In all cases, the following steps should be taken into account before making an alliance decision:
Step 3: Tap Internal and External Resources to Form Project Teams. In forming the project teams the central unit should follow these steps:
|
|
ALLIANCE |
DETAILS |
Type |
R&D collaboration, joint venture, partnership, license |
Party |
Supplier, distributor, customer, university lab, R&D organization |
Duration |
Project-based, commercialization of technology, set or unlimited |
Purpose |
Combine strengths, reduce time to market, gain knowledge, economies of scale, access to blocking patent |
Competitive advantage (competitive assessment of partner) |
Customer base, market reach, proficiency and expertise, performance results |
Skills accessed |
[List] |
EXHIBIT 12.6 Alliance Portfolio Chart
Many methods are available to operationalize the generic innovation strategies outlined under Process 2. The most important consideration in choosing a certain innovation method is aligning it with strategy and culture. Otherwise, the method will not be effective and may create confusion if the method's underlying philosophy conflicts with the cultural values or the strategy of the organization. Hence, as a preparatory step to Processes 5 through 8, the organization needs to choose the methods that enable its innovation strategy, according to Exhibit 12.7. It should be noted, however, that even if an organization has a certain innovation strategy, individual business units may still use a method mentioned under another innovation strategy that is aligned with the business unit's specific strategy, goals, and objectives. For example, a service business unit (e.g., financial services) may adopt a customer-driven innovation strategy, while another consumer products business unit may adopt a technology-driven innovation strategy. Alternatively, the organization may choose to implement some of these methods for a new business or when moving to a new market where another strategy is more appropriate. Processes 5 through 8 provide a guide as to the creation of idea banks, implementation of the lead user, and technology management methods.


Process 4: Structural Changes for IM